| Completion Criteria for Workshop Portfolio Project | |
| 8 (or more) html documents with these criteria: | 1. Index.html page: Introductory page with logo graphic and links to workshop components
2. Pre-workshop survey Set of questions that determine skill beginning skill level of participants (may use Likert scale or set of descriptions)
3. Daily Agendas 3 html documents that include the following:
4. Resource List List of related web sites used in the daily activities plus other valuable websites so the list contains at least 10 valuable resources related to activities in workshop:
5. Materials List Lists all materials (especially software) discussed in workshop with links to company websites
5. QuickTip Page “How-to” section with step-by-step directions for skill instruction
|
| Posted to your server | Each UL student has 20 MB of server space for the posting of webpages, etc. Directions for posting: |
| URL posted to Blackboard | Post URL of your project to Blackboard or send to Dr. Figg |
Grading Rubric For Personal Skills Portfolio
| Criteria | Excellent (3) | Satisfactory (2) | Needs Improvement (1) | Score |
| Completion | 1. All components present 2. Webpages created that meet all specified criteria above 3. Posted to the server 4. URL posted to Blackboard |
1. 98-99% of components present 2. Webpages created meet 90% of all specified critiera above. 3. Posted to the server 4. URL posted to Blackboard |
1. Below 98% of components present 2. Webpages meet 90% criteria or below. 3. Posted to the server (Not posting to the server will result in a grade of 0) 4. No URL |
|
| Timeliness | Posted on time | Posted 1 day late | Posted 2 days late | |
| Product Mechanics | 1. All links, animations, and movies work 2. No spelling, typo, grammar errors |
1. 1 or more links do not work 2. 1-3 spelling, typo, grammar errors |
1. Links do not work 2. More than 3 spelling, typo, grammar errors |
|
| Target Audience Specified | Statement of target audience clearly identifies 3 or more audience characteristics | Statement of target audience specifies 2 or fewer audience characteristics | Statement of target audience does not identify audience characteristics | |
| ISTE Standards connected | Statement of connection to ISTE Standards clearly identifies 5 or more standards related to this training | Statement of connection to ISTE Standards clearly identifies 3-4 standards related to this training | Statement of connection to ISTE Standards identifies fewer than 3 standards related to this training; and the connection between the standards and the training is unclear | |
| Incentives | Creative and
pertinent to target audience; included a minimum of 5 times during the workshop |
Included 5 times during the workshop without relevance to target audience or only 4 incentives | Included 4 times during the workshop without relevance to target audience or only 3 incentives | |
| Content | Well organized and clearly explained; creative; flows easily in a sequential manner | Organization is obvious but explanations not sequenced or clearly explained | Organization is unclear; explanations are unclear; or sequencing of activities inappropriate | |
| Classroom Management Strategies | Statement clearly identifies classroom management strategies | No statement that identifies classroom management strategies | ||
| Day 1 Agenda | ||||
| Organization | 1. Schedule
for Day’s activities clear; |
1.Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in 1-2 instances; 2. Appropriate time provided for all but 1-2 activities |
1. Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in more than 3 instances; |
|
| Completeness | 1. All components
included (see list above; 2. All components clearly explained |
1. 1 component
missing; 2. 1-2 components not clearly explained |
1. 2 components
missing; 2. 3 or more components not clearly explained |
|
| Quality | 1. Activities
(Techie moments) clearly organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
organized around a technology strand but 1-2 not appropriate; 2. Activities not clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for all but 1-2 of the activities listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. All but 1-2 activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
not organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities not identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity are not listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities are not sequenced to provide skill building |
|
| Day 2 Agenda | ||||
| Organization | 1. Schedule
for Day’s activities clear; |
1.Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in 1-2 instances; 2. Appropriate time provided for all but 1-2 activities |
1. Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in more than 3 instances; |
|
| Completeness | 1. All components
included (see list above; 2. All components clearly explained |
1. 1 component
missing; 2. 1-2 components not clearly explained |
1. 2 components
missing; 2. 3 or more components not clearly explained |
|
| Quality | 1. Activities
(Techie moments) clearly organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
organized around a technology strand but 1-2 not appropriate; 2. Activities not clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for all but 1-2 of the activities listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. All but 1-2 activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
not organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities not identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity are not listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities are not sequenced to provide skill building |
|
| Day 3 Agenda | ||||
| Organization | 1. Schedule
for Day’s activities clear; |
1.Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in 1-2 instances; 2. Appropriate time provided for all but 1-2 activities |
1. Schedule
for Day’s activities included but unclear in more than 3 instances; |
|
| Completeness | 1. All components
included (see list above; 2. All components clearly explained |
1. 1 component
missing; 2. 1-2 components not clearly explained |
1. 2 components
missing; 2. 3 or more components not clearly explained |
|
| Quality | 1. Activities
(Techie moments) clearly organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
organized around a technology strand but 1-2 not appropriate; 2. Activities not clearly identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for all but 1-2 of the activities listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. All but 1-2 activities sequenced to provide skill building |
1. Activities
not organized around a technology strand; 2. Activities not identified as to how they could be included in a lesson design; 3. Skills for each activity are not listed and linked to QuickTips; 4. Activities are not sequenced to provide skill building |
|
Total
Score (out of 50 possible points) |
||||